Haim Steinbach at Berkeley Art Museum |
|
|
| Monday, 11 July 2005 15:52 |
BERKELEY, CA.- The Berkeley Art Museum presents Haim Steinbach/Matrix 217: Work in Progress: Objects for People- Snapshots. What do the things we own say about us? From the objects with which we choose to surround ourselves, something about our secret lives can be known: who our ancestors are, what our fantasies are, how much money we have or want. In 1979, Haim Steinbach had a show at New York's Artist Space that commenced his career. For that exhibition, he installed wallpaper in the gallery, borrowed objects from friends, and placed the items on shelves. By the late 1980s, Steinbach was recognized as one of the world's leading contemporary artists, known for having radically redefined the status of objects in art. But Steinbach was lumped together with artists ranging from Jeff Koons and Barbara Kruger to Peter Halley and Ashley Bickerton, with whom he shared a method—appropriation—but not intention. The term Neo-Geo and the association of consumerism, simulation, and commodity were indiscriminately assigned to his work along with the others'. In a famous 1986 roundtable titled “From Criticism to Complicity,” Steinbach distinguished his approach when he spoke of the role of desire in his work. In a recent interview in Artforum, he elaborated: “Desire translates into the things with which we ritualize our lives and into the way we communicate and portray ourselves through objects.”
Steinbach works with existing objects, but his process goes beyond the Duchampian model to issues of display. Essential to his arrangements are the structures in which the objects are placed: hard-edged, minimalist shelves, immense industrial shelving units, or rooms to enter. Some objects are found, others borrowed or bought, among them old mattresses, figurines, Nike shoes, and dustbins. Through their selection, arrangement, and perhaps most importantly, their juxtaposition, Steinbach explores their cultural, psychological, and ritualistic meanings. The associations, narrative or otherwise, are sometimes immediately comprehensible, at other times oblique, but in them the myriad attributes of modern living are illuminated. He is currently working on a similar project in Vienna titled Objects for People. His Berkeley project, Work in Progress: Objects for People—Snapshots, will increase our awareness of how the objects that make up our lives mandate our daily rituals. We are not only what we eat, but also what we own, each of these choices stemming from individual desire.Click on logo below to add this article to your favorite Social Website ~ |
Related Articles :


BERKELEY, CA.- The Berkeley Art Museum presents Haim Steinbach/Matrix 217: Work in Progress: Objects for People- Snapshots. What do the things we own say about us? From the objects with which we choose to surround ourselves, something about our secret lives can be known: who our ancestors are, what our fantasies are, how much money we have or want. In 1979, Haim Steinbach had a show at New York's Artist Space that commenced his career. For that exhibition, he installed wallpaper in the gallery, borrowed objects from friends, and placed the items on shelves. By the late 1980s, Steinbach was recognized as one of the world's leading contemporary artists, known for having radically redefined the status of objects in art. But Steinbach was lumped together with artists ranging from Jeff Koons and Barbara Kruger to Peter Halley and Ashley Bickerton, with whom he shared a method—appropriation—but not intention. The term Neo-Geo and the association of consumerism, simulation, and commodity were indiscriminately assigned to his work along with the others'. In a famous 1986 roundtable titled “From Criticism to Complicity,” Steinbach distinguished his approach when he spoke of the role of desire in his work. In a recent interview in Artforum, he elaborated: “Desire translates into the things with which we ritualize our lives and into the way we communicate and portray ourselves through objects.”
Steinbach works with existing objects, but his process goes beyond the Duchampian model to issues of display. Essential to his arrangements are the structures in which the objects are placed: hard-edged, minimalist shelves, immense industrial shelving units, or rooms to enter. Some objects are found, others borrowed or bought, among them old mattresses, figurines, Nike shoes, and dustbins. Through their selection, arrangement, and perhaps most importantly, their juxtaposition, Steinbach explores their cultural, psychological, and ritualistic meanings. The associations, narrative or otherwise, are sometimes immediately comprehensible, at other times oblique, but in them the myriad attributes of modern living are illuminated. He is currently working on a similar project in Vienna titled Objects for People. His Berkeley project, Work in Progress: Objects for People—Snapshots, will increase our awareness of how the objects that make up our lives mandate our daily rituals. We are not only what we eat, but also what we own, each of these choices stemming from individual desire.
